AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
64 thunderbird4/6/2023 Lastly, a concern for older cars is to get one that will fit in your garage (measure them, some are huge!) ![]() I was not necessarily brand loyal, but it had to be something that I found attractive and something I would want to drive. It had to be something I could inspect myself before purchase, so that eliminated cars across the country. (Since your price is higher, you will have more choices). I decided I wanted a convertible that was as original as possible, in as good shape as possible, and didn't want to spend more than $8,000 tops. ![]() I kind of went through the same thought process you are currently considering, the only difference is I started with late 50's Chrysler's (Fury, then a New Yorker) before laying a few ground rules for me to follow: Plus, a Caddy convertible worth having is out of my budget.Īgain, keep the 64-66 T-Bird comments coming (by the way, I agree the front grill of the '66 is pretty ugly), but I guess I'm now open to hearing about other 60's convertibles. I love the look of the 61-62 Cadillac convertibles, but don't want to have to call in a "tug boat" every time I want to park the thing - or my loan officer in order to keep the gas tank full. I know dealers charge a premium and a better deal can be gotten from a private seller.Ĭonsequently, you all now have my permission (ha!) to break rank and give me your opinions in terms of 60's convertibles worth considering. This is a Supreme with A/C and IS NOT a 442 or an SX - and still, they're asking $24,500! I've got a good base of knowledge with regard to the values of mid 60's T-Birds and Mustangs and $24,500 seems awfully high for a '72 Cutlass Supreme - albeit an extremely nice one. Speaking of price, I found a very clean, detailed 72 Cutlass convertible for sale via the internet at a classic car dealer in Las Vegas (). Plus, you can use the trunk when the top is down (unlike the T-Bird - bummer!). Finally, it's back seat area is larger than in a Mustang. Plus, a 350 engine and Turbo 400 auto is a pretty good combo. It doesn't have nearly as much style as a 64-65 T-Bird, but it's more modern suspension probably results in a better driving car. Ya know, after reading the posts in the "looking for reliable 50-60's family classic" discussion forum, I'm starting to think a 1970-72 Cutlass convertible might be a better choice for what I want. I know the Mustang's back seat is really tight. My wife and I have a 10 and 13 year old so back seat room is an issue. a Mustang) is that I think the Thunderbird has a larger interior - particularly in the back seat. Though, I didn't want to drive it over 50 mph (didn't feel comfortable to do so). ![]() Despite these negatives, it drove fairly decently. It wasn't in particularly good condition and didn't have power steering or power brakes. I drove a '65 Mustang convertible the other day that is for sale in my area (Central Indiana). Hopefully, this would buy me a T-Bird that can go down the road pretty well and be able to stay in my garage more than my local mechanic's. The '64 T-Bird convertibles I've found that look like what I want (already restored and in "turnkey" condition) have "asking" prices in the $20,000 to $25,000 range and all available from private sellers. Consequently, I very much appreciate comments from those with actual driving experience. Thus, I don't have a frame of reference in terms of how well they drive. I appreciate them all.Īdmittedly, I have zero experience driving a Flairbird - or, any T-Bird for that matter. I'd heard they weren't the greatest.Īgain, keep the 64-66 T-Bird comments (good and bad) coming. Thanks ISELLHONDAS for the "heads up" with regard to the confort level on the T-Bird's seats. Not trying to be a "stick in the mud" - just trying to keep the conversation flowing in the intended direction. You'll spend less money (than for a restored 60's classic) and have an exponentially better car to go romping on a twisty back road.Īnyway, this is a 1964-1966 Thunderbird discussion so let's not wander too far off of the subject. In my opinion, if you want to go fast, go buy a new Firebird/Camaro (while you still can) or late model Corvette. Neck snapping acceleration and slot-car handling are not priorities on a nice autumn day while cruising in 1960's convertible - that's not the point. My second choice is a '66 Mustang GT convertible, but nice one's are pretty pricey (though nice T-Birds aren't cheap!). In terms of performance, I'm looking for a nice cruising car (hence my need for a convertible). I know the 64's drum brakes are less than steller, but I believe they can be replaced with disc units - at the very least from a '65, but better units are probably available. ![]() I really like the look of the "Flairbirds" particularly the '64. The Riviera is certainly a nice car, but I want a convertible - so that eliminates the Rivi from consideration. I started this string and have appreciated the comments thus far.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |